{"id":1242,"date":"2003-06-23T09:04:50","date_gmt":"2003-06-23T16:04:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/jed\/2003\/06\/23\/1242.html"},"modified":"2003-06-23T09:04:50","modified_gmt":"2003-06-23T16:04:50","slug":"cipa-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/jed\/2003\/06\/23\/cipa-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"CIPA upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Grr.  The Supremes (I still think the term \"SCOTUS\" sounds vaguely obscene) have upheld the \"Children's Internet Protection Act\" (with a name like that, who could oppose it?), allowing Congress to require public libraries to install ineffective porn filters on their computers.  (Can you tell that I am completely objective about this, 100% unbiased in any way?)  Apparently the fact that patrons can request that the filter be disabled was enough for the Supremes.<\/p>\n<p>I heard a great piece on NPR a few years ago featuring a public librarian giving an impassioned defense of keeping public-library computers free of filters.  A parent phoned in to object to letting our kids see that horrible smut stuff, and the librarian noted that her library did in fact have copies of X-rated magazines.  But the <cite>New York Times<\/cite> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/06\/23\/politics\/23WIRE-FILTER.html\">article about the CIPA decision<\/a> notes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The government had argued that libraries don't have X-rated movies and magazines on their shelves and shouldn't have to offer access to pornography on their computers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>(That's a marvel of phrasing.  \"Shouldn't have to offer access to pornography\"&#8212;because without the CIPA, all public libraries will be forced to shove smut down the throats of all their patrons!  Especially the children!)<\/p>\n<p>So now I'm curious: do most public libraries provide other forms of smut?  I imagine all of them have explicitly sexual prose books, but what about photo magazines?<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Grr. The Supremes (I still think the term &#8220;SCOTUS&#8221; sounds vaguely obscene) have upheld the &#8220;Children&#8217;s Internet Protection Act&#8221; (with&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1242","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/jed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/jed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/jed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/jed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/jed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1242"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/jed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1242\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/jed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/jed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1242"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/jed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}