{"id":10455,"date":"2007-03-07T13:18:41","date_gmt":"2007-03-07T18:18:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2007\/03\/07\/10455.html"},"modified":"2018-03-12T16:55:47","modified_gmt":"2018-03-12T21:55:47","slug":"well-and-where-is-it-written-t","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2007\/03\/07\/well-and-where-is-it-written-t\/","title":{"rendered":"well, and where is it written that life is fair?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>So. Scooter Libby is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/03\/07\/washington\/07libby.html\">guilty<\/a>. Hurray. I mean, he broke the law, and I am happy that he has been convicted for breaking the law. I hope the conviction stands, I hope he is sentenced to a year in prison, and I hope he serves it.\n<p>That said, I admit that I feel a bit of sympathy for the man. I mean, all the criminal acts the man undertook were either (a) at the specific instructions of the Vice-President of the United States, (2) with the knowledge and tacit consent of the Vice-President of the United States, or (iii) undertaken with good reason to believe that they were what the Vice-President of the United States wanted him to do, even if the VPotUS was not specifically aware of them. This doesn&#8217;t in any way excuse the crimes, but it does seem a bit unfair that he is prosecuted, convicted and (I hope) sentenced and (I hope) punished, while the aforementioned Vice-President of the United States is not.\n<p>Particularly at the beginning, where the VPotUS and architect of our national security program tells his Chief of Staff that it is in the interests of national security to leak a bit of classified information. I mean, yes, he oughtn&#8217;t have done it, but Our Only President had in fact granted his Vice-President substantial authority over classifying and declassifying state secrets. There&#8217;s a sense in which the difference between declassifying and leaking a piece of information is procedural. It&#8217;s a wrong sense, that fundamentally misinterprets the purpose and necessity of state secrets in the first place, but fine.\n<p>Later, though, when the leak has finally seeped through into the public awareness and now people are hunting for the leakers, Mr. Libby lied, perjured himself and obstructed justice.\n<p><I>Digression:<\/I> why is perjury reflexive? You can&#8217;t perjure someone else, can you? But the verb seems to need a direct object (if that&#8217;s the right terminology), and there&#8217;s only one possible. It seems odd, though. End Digression\n<p>I assume that Mr. Libby was instructed to so obstruct, and he ought to have refused, and when he didn&#8217;t, he took on responsibility for the crime. Not sole responsibility, though. Even if Our Only Vice-President didn&#8217;t specifically instruct Mr. Libby to lie, he certainly knew that Mr. Libby was lying, and failed to correct that. And <I>he is the Vice-President<\/I>. That&#8217;s in addition to all the stuff we guessed and now know about the way the White House and the OVP work, in violation of any conceivable moral or ethical principle. I&#8217;m just talking about the <I>crimes<\/I>.\n<P>Let me repeat: I am happy that Mr. Libby has been convicted. I hope he gets sent up the proverbial, and frankly, the longer he is yarded the better. It won&#8217;t seem any more fair if he gets away with it, too. But it sure seems like there&#8217;s somebody missing from the dock.\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.\n<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So. Scooter Libby is guilty. Hurray. I mean, he broke the law, and I am happy that he has been convicted for breaking the law. I hope the conviction stands, I hope he is sentenced to a year in prison,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[203],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nytimes"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10455"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10455\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17976,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10455\/revisions\/17976"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}