{"id":10574,"date":"2007-07-31T21:58:56","date_gmt":"2007-08-01T01:58:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2007\/07\/31\/10574.html"},"modified":"2018-03-12T16:56:54","modified_gmt":"2018-03-12T21:56:54","slug":"sullying-a-good-name","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2007\/07\/31\/sullying-a-good-name\/","title":{"rendered":"Sullying a good name"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>So. The <I>Economist<\/I> has a blog on &#8220;life and art&#8221; called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moreintelligentlife.com\/moreover\/\">Moreover<\/a>. It appears to be utterly worthless. What&#8217;s that about?\n<p>They have guest posts from Diane and Michael Ravitch about ... well, the first one is about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moreintelligentlife.com\/moreover\/2007\/07\/guest-post-1.html\">Cultural vandalism in schools<\/a> where they claim that &#8220;the history curriculum in most states does not mention the names of any significant individuals&#8221;. Really? I suspect this is an outright lie. Of course, it could be a tautology, I mean, all you have to do is declare that any individuals mentioned by name in the history curriculum are insignificant and hey presto. The post, bye-the-bye, is occasioned by a story in the Daily Mail (seriously) called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/pages\/live\/articles\/news\/news.html?in_article_id=467889&amp;in_page_id=1770\">Schools told to dump Churchill and Hitler from history lessons<\/a>, which gives the impression that schoolteachers will be forbidden to mention the names <I>Winston<\/I> or <I>Adolf<\/I>. Reading, for instance, <a href=\"http:\/\/education.guardian.co.uk\/schools\/story\/0,,2124437,00.html\">School curriculum to make room for new subjects<\/a> in the Guardian, makes it clear that the main point of the change is to allow for greater flexibility in teaching, school to school. To quote the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.qca.org.uk\/qca_12195.aspx\">Qualifications and Curriculum Authority<\/a>: &#8220;The new programmes of study have been designed to give teachers a less prescriptive, more flexible framework for teaching, creating more scope to tailor the curriculum to meet the needs of each individual student.&#8221; In other words, they decline to provide in the national Curriculum a list of facts for students to parrot, but want teachers to use their initiative to, well, teach. Mr. Churchill isn&#8217;t out, what is out is the central authority dictating what exactly is to be taught, outside a general framework. Vandalism!\n<p>Now, if that was stupid and dishonest, try the second guest post, where Ms. Ravitch laments <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moreintelligentlife.com\/moreover\/2007\/07\/guest-post-2.html\">Lindsay Lohan and the paucity of allusion<\/a>. Writers these days, you see, rather than quoting Oliver Goldsmith or Wilfred Owen, have only a meager supply of literary and historical references and must &#8220;stick with banalities, trivialities, the words that everyone understands, free of allusions and unburdened by any hint of an educated mind.&#8221; Yes, yes. Or rather, Sadly, No!\n<p>Sure, 80% of our politician&#8217;s literary allusions are to the Bible and hymns, but surely that&#8217;s appropriate, and furthermore was always true. John Kerry, as I noted at the time, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/journal\/show-entry.php?Entry_ID=2045\">referenced Langston Hughes<\/a>. We have seen more than one Presidential candidate this cycle allude to Abraham Lincoln&#8217;s speeches. I recall Bob Dole in 1996, wild-eyed, quoting Ira Gershwin, but of course Ira Gershwin is effectively Lindsay Lohan, isn&#8217;t he? Or is he? And what about all those Lindsay Lohan references all our politicians are making&#8212;not so much? Simpsons jokes on the stump? I don&#8217;t remember any. Is it possible that Ms. Ravitch is simply <I>outright lying<\/I> about the state of political rhetoric? Sadly, yes.\n<p>I know that those are guest posts and that Mr. and Ms. Ravitch are not going to be among the continuing bloggers. But then the Editor, Emily Bobrow, gets to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moreintelligentlife.com\/moreover\/2007\/07\/the-rise-of-cit.html\">mock citizen reporters<\/a> because they&#8212;get this!&#8212;work in <I>pajama bottoms<\/I>! Ha, ha, ha Ms. Bobrow. Yes, that would disqualify them from journalism, whose practitioners never, ever write in anything less than full formal kit. Whenever I read an article, my first question is <I>what was the reporter wearing while writing this<\/I>, and because of course I have no idea, I <I>make shit up<\/I> and then <I>judge the quality of the reporting based on the shit I made up<\/I>. Maybe I can blog for the Economist.\n<p>I mean, seriously. The Economist has a well-deserved reputation for caring about actual facts. I mean, other than their rather sweet and childlike belief in <strike>Santa Claus<\/strike> the free market. A good magazine, what with one thing and another. What the hell are they doing with this crap?\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.\n<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So. The Economist has a blog on \u201clife and art\u201d called Moreover. It appears to be utterly worthless. What\u2019s that about? They have guest posts from Diane and Michael Ravitch about &#8230; well, the first one is about Cultural vandalism&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[201],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-navel-gazing"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10574"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10574\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16218,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10574\/revisions\/16218"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}