{"id":10609,"date":"2007-09-10T10:38:28","date_gmt":"2007-09-10T14:38:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2007\/09\/10\/10609.html"},"modified":"2018-03-12T16:56:57","modified_gmt":"2018-03-12T21:56:57","slug":"theres-a-there-there-but-where","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2007\/09\/10\/theres-a-there-there-but-where\/","title":{"rendered":"There&#8217;s a there there, but where?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Here&#8217;s a couple of paragraphs from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/09\/10\/books\/10shock.html?ref=arts\">Free-Market Mischief in Hot Spots of Disaster<\/a>, by Patricia Cohen in this morning&#8217;s New York Times. It&#8217;s about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.naomiklein.org\/shock-doctrine\">The Shock Doctrine<\/a>, a book by Naomi Klein, or about Naomi Klein, or about the short film <I>The Shock Doctrine<\/I> that serves as a sort of extended trailer for the book, and that played at the Venice and Toronto film festivals. Actually, the article is a bit of a mess. Here are a couple of paragraphs:\n<blockquote>&#8220;The Take,&#8221; her 2004 documentary about a workers&#8217; cooperative in Argentina produced with her husband, Avi Lewis, was being filmed when Carlos Sa\ufffdl Menem, the former president who had presided over that county&#8217;s economic collapse, unsuccessfully attempted a dramatic comeback. Argentina was where Ms. Klein began to formulate her argument in &#8220;The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism,&#8221; being released in the United States on Sept. 18.<p>&#8220;I felt it emotionally before I understood it factually,&#8221; Ms. Klein said during a recent visit to New York from her home in Canada. It was &#8220;blindingly obvious&#8221; to everyone there, she said, that there was a &#8220;connection between violence, the military coup and these economic policies that people didn&#8217;t want.&#8221;<\/blockquote>\n<p>In that second paragraph&#8212;the word <I>there<\/I> refers to what? New York, where Ms. Klein was visiting? No. Her home in Canada? Perhaps. Argentina, where she began to formulate her argument? I think so.\n<p>Now, I do believe that it&#8217;s OK, grammatically, for a pronoun to refer back to the previous sentence&#8212;\n<p><I>Digression<\/I>: Y&#8217;all who know these things, tell me: what do we call the word <I>there<\/I> in the sentence <B>It was &#8220;blindingly obvious&#8221; to everyone there<\/B>? It&#8217;s an adjective, yes? I mean, a modifier? It modifies the word <I>everyone<\/I>, right? Only it&#8217;s a pronoun, too, in the sense that it takes the place of a noun, that is (for argument&#8217;s sake) <I>Argentina<\/I>. Or, rather, it takes the place of a modifying phrase, say, <I>in Argentina<\/I>, because you certainly couldn&#8217;t say <b>It was &#8220;blindingly obvious&#8221; to everyone Argentina<\/b>. So it takes the place of a prepositional phrase that modifies the indefinite pronoun <I>everywhere<\/I>. So in the way that a <I>pronoun<\/I> is a word standing for a noun (or noun phrase), is there a <I>pronadjective<\/I> that stands for an adjectival phrase? Or a <I>promodifier<\/I>? Or is it just an ordinary adjective? My dictionary does not allow it to be an adjective in that manner. Is it somehow a shorthand adverb&#8212;<b>It was &#8220;blindingly obvious&#8221; to everyone <I>[who was]<\/I> there<\/b>&#8212;to a verb that we would have to invent? And how do you indicate, as a part of speech, that it requires an antecedent? Seriously, wattzupp w&#8217;datt? <I>End Digression<\/I>.\n<p>&#8212;or even the previous paragraph. But if you are going to leave the antecedent in the previous paragraph, do not insert a plausible alternate antecedent earlier in the second paragraph. Do not insert two such plausible alternates. Particularly avoid doing so if you are just introducing irrelevant information. I know Ms. Cohen is oh-so-cleverly slipping in two bits of information (<I>where<\/I> the interview took place, and <I>where<\/I> the subject resides) without having to clunkily write whole sentences about them. But there are much better places for the residence info (whole paragraphs about Ms. Klein&#8217;s Canadian history, f&#8217;r&#8217;ex), and the circumstances of the interview turn out to play no particular role in the article.\n<p>I am picking on Ms. Cohen for no particular reason. It is tempting to try to tie this particular poor choice, and the fact that nobody caught it or changed it, into a grander critique of newspapery in general, but in fact no good newspaper procedure or policy will ever eliminate such sentences. I really am just ranting, because&#8212;well, it&#8217;s a blog, you know?\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.\n<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here\u2019s a couple of paragraphs from Free-Market Mischief in Hot Spots of Disaster, by Patricia Cohen in this morning\u2019s New York Times. It\u2019s about The Shock Doctrine, a book by Naomi Klein, or about Naomi Klein, or about the short&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[203],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nytimes"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10609"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10609\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18101,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10609\/revisions\/18101"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}