{"id":11624,"date":"2008-11-08T15:42:33","date_gmt":"2008-11-08T20:42:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2008\/11\/08\/11624.html"},"modified":"2018-06-11T09:57:12","modified_gmt":"2018-06-11T14:57:12","slug":"pirke-avot-verse-two-charity-o","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2008\/11\/08\/pirke-avot-verse-two-charity-o\/","title":{"rendered":"Pirke Avot, verse two, charity (or lovingkindness)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>We are almost through the text of the second verse. Aren&#8217;t we barreling along at a tremendous pace? It just picks up in intensity and excitement as we go. Here&#8217;s the Hertz again:<br \/>\n<p><blockquote>Simon the Just was one of the last survivors of the Great Assembly: He used to say, Upon three things the world is based: upon the Torah, upon Divine service, and <strong>upon the practice of charity<\/strong>.<\/blockquote><br \/>\n<p>I don&#8217;t like this translation at all, I&#8217;m afraid. Charity is generally <I>tzedakah<\/i>, and this is <i>chasidim<\/i>. I was taught (when I was taught the song, or rather one of the songs) that this was acts of lovingkindness. In fact, there&#8217;s a distinction made between <I>tzedakah<\/i> and <i>g&#8217;milut chasidim<\/i>, that the former is made from a desire to alleviate a problem and are done out of pity and with sorrow, but the latter are made from a desire to enrich and are done out of love and with joy. Of course, having made the distinction, it isn&#8217;t necessarily clear which category any individual act comes from, so it isn&#8217;t really a practical difference. But there is a difference in connotation, and I prefer to keep that difference.<br \/>\n<p>Still, unlike the previous <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2008\/11\/08\/11621.html\">two<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2008\/11\/08\/11623.html\">legs<\/a>, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any real question what the leg <i>is<\/i>. Acts of <i>chesed<\/i>, of kindness (and yes, that&#8217;s why Chasidim are called Chasidim) are one of the foundations of the world. With all the study and prayer, with all the law and service, with all the words and the feelings, with the Torah and the siddur, all of that is not enough foundation for the world without <I>g&#8217;milut chasadim<\/i>.<br \/>\n<p>Reb Jochanon ben Zaccai and Reb Joshua were of the generation that saw the destruction of the Second Temple. When they left the holy city, they looked back and saw the ruins of the Temple, and Reb Joshua wept with a great weeping, for only the in the Temple in the city of Jerusalem could the sins of Israel be atoned. And now it was gone. But Reb Jochanon said that there was another way, as it is written in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.blueletterbible.org\/Bible.cfm?b=Hsa&amp;c=6&amp;v=6&amp;t=KJV#6\">Hosea<\/a>: the Lord desires <i>chesed<\/i> and not sacrifice, and the knowledge of the Divine more than burnt offerings. And what of Daniel, asked Jochanon. Daniel did not offer sacrifices in Jerusalem. And it is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.blueletterbible.org\/Bible.cfm?b=Dan&amp;c=6&amp;v=10&amp;t=KJV#10\">written<\/a>: he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks. He gave charity to the needy, he rejoiced with people in their joy, he wept with them in their sorrow, he helped and cheered brides on their wedding days, he honored the dead by following the funerals to the cemeteries. And were Daniel&#8217;s prayers not received?<br \/>\n<p><i>Note<\/i>: This story is paraphrased from Rabbi Natan&#8217;s <I>tosefta<\/I>, with his illustrative verses. It would be misleading and wrong to try to study the text without stories like these, but I don&#8217;t just want to cut and paste them from an old translation that happens to be on-line. So I figure I will retell the stories myself, out of the old texts, and y&#8217;all will read them and like it. Yes? If this is insufficiently rigorous, or is too arrogant, or just annoying, let me know and I&#8217;ll try to come up with something else. End note.<br \/>\n<p>So. The last and greatest of the foundations of the earth is <I>g&#8217;milut chasadim<\/i>, acts of lovingkindness. And here we have yet another way to spin the metaphor around, not physical foundations but logical foundations, they are the <i>reasons<\/i> the world exists. The Divine created the universe (this view implies) so that Jews could study Torah, yes, and to receive the prayers of the righteous which like the smoke from the sacrifices was sweet to the Divine Nostrils, but also to provide a place for acts of lovingkindness, without which the universe is incomplete. And which of course would not be possible without a universe, a physical, temporal universe to act in.<br \/>\n<p>And spin it again: if the universe being discussed is your own personal universe, the one you perceive, as I often take it to be, there are the three foundations that will last: Scripture, prayer and love. Build ye not your house upon sand, because, you know, sand, not a great foundation, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anyone going around saying <i>I know! Sand!<\/I> (although a quick Google search to make sure I got the reference right (it&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.blueletterbible.org\/Bible.cfm?b=Mat&amp;c=7&amp;v=26&amp;t=KJV#26\">Matthew 7:26<\/a>) brought up a sponsored link to designs for beach houses) (and eternal damnation) (now I&#8217;ve lost the thread of the sentence) but you have to find your rocks to build on, and Just Simon used to say there were three good ones.<br \/>\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Which Your Humble Blogger manages not to leave the conclusion to a fifth note for this rainy Shabbat.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[207],"tags":[212],"class_list":["post-11624","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-scripture","tag-pirkeavot"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11624","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11624"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11624\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18578,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11624\/revisions\/18578"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}