{"id":13680,"date":"2011-04-15T13:45:03","date_gmt":"2011-04-15T17:45:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2011\/04\/15\/13680.html"},"modified":"2018-03-13T18:58:38","modified_gmt":"2018-03-13T23:58:38","slug":"rough-crossing-farce-or-menace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2011\/04\/15\/rough-crossing-farce-or-menace\/","title":{"rendered":"Rough Crossing: Farce or Menace?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Is <I>Rough Crossing<\/i> a farce?\n<p>What are the markings of a true farce? Well, that&#8217;s an excellent question. I think we have to use syndrome thinking here; of the <I>n<\/i> symptoms of farce syndrome, a play that exhibits all of them is clearly a farce, a play that exhibits none of them is clearly not a farce, and a play that exhibits, oh, two-thirds <I>n<\/i> of them is a farce, and a play that exhibits about half is a source of argument. So. What have we got? I think of a farce as having\n<p><ol><li>laughs<\/li><li>repetition<\/li><li>a fast pace<\/li><li>disguises or misidentification of persons<\/li><li>cross-talk (misidentification of subjects)<\/li><li>overheard conversation<\/li><li>coincidences<\/li><li>repetition<\/li><li>hiding, ideally multiple people behind multiple doors<\/li><li>slapstick<\/li><li>taboo-violation (violence, nudity, profanity, etc played for laughs)<\/li><li>character types (the trickster or promiscuous servant, the doddering scholar, the lustful priest, the unfaithful wife, the innocent virgin, the separated twins, etc)<\/li><li>repetition<\/li><\/ol>\n<p><I>Rough Crossing<\/i> has some of those: it&#8217;s a fast-paced comedy with a lot of repetition and cross-talk, and the plot is driven by an overheard conversation. That&#8217;s four. On the other hand, everybody knows who everybody is, and nobody is mistaken for anyone else. Nobody wears a disguise. There is no nudity or even particularly revealing undress; there&#8217;s next to no profanity and there is no violence; to the extent that there is taboo-violation at all it consists of shouting a few relatively mild insults. There are some physical gags, verging on slapstick, but nobody even falls down. And I&#8217;m not actually clear to what extent the characters are character types; they are recognizable, but they are not written as types, confined to their type-actions. Even the servant character, is not so much a variation on the type as a&#8230; well, I&#8217;m not sure. Our Director calls Dvornichek a fool, which is not from the farce tradition at all, but also is not quite right, I think, as the purpose of the character is not truth-telling or trickery at all. I don&#8217;t know what the purpose of the character is, come to think of it. It&#8217;s a brilliant creation, a magnificent thing in itself, but it doesn&#8217;t move the plot along, or hinder it, or pass along messages (to the wrong people or with the wrong words) or otherwise do the things I would expect a servant type in a farce to do. So that&#8217;s four that are missing.\n<P>On the other hand, it&#8217;s a fast-paced comedy with a lot of repetition and cross-talk, and the plot is driven by an overheard conversation. That&#8217;s four. So I think this falls clearly into the subject of argument category.\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Which Your Humble Blogger really does feel obligated to reference the line about it being a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham, although there really isn&#8217;t any travesty, and only a little sham. A lot of mockery, though.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[209],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theeyater"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13680"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13680\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19345,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13680\/revisions\/19345"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}