{"id":13833,"date":"2011-09-15T11:40:06","date_gmt":"2011-09-15T15:40:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2011\/09\/15\/13833.html"},"modified":"2018-03-13T19:00:02","modified_gmt":"2018-03-14T00:00:02","slug":"news-of-the-day-a-couple-of-da","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2011\/09\/15\/news-of-the-day-a-couple-of-da\/","title":{"rendered":"News of the day (a couple of days ago)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Pedro Segarra won the Democratic Primary for Hartford&#8217;s Mayoralty this week, pretty much guaranteeing him re-election in November. Take a look at the story in the <i>Courant<\/i>: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courant.com\/community\/hartford\/hc-hartford-primary-0914-20110913,0,4189692.story\">Segarra Wins Democratic Mayoral Primary<\/a>. Seriously, scan through that article by the <i>Courant&#8217;s<\/i> Jenna Carlesso, because what I am writing about is what isn&#8217;t in that article. It&#8217;s in his <a href=\"http:\/\/mayor.hartford.gov\/Webfiles\/bio_mayor.aspx\">official bio<\/a> and it&#8217;s in his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.segarraformayor.com\/about\">campaign site bio<\/a>&#8212;it&#8217;s not a secret, it&#8217;s just not newsworthy.\n<P>Mayor Segarra is gay. And it&#8217;s not newsworthy.\n<p>In fact, I believe that Pedro Segarra is the first large-city mayor who is in a legal same-sex marriage.\n<P><i>Digression<\/i>: the phrasing there is terrible, but it&#8217;s an awkward sort of record. The colloquial way to phrase it is that Mayor Segarra is the first legally <i>gay-married<\/i> big-city mayor, but I frankly dislike the <i>gay-married<\/i> colloquialism. I first typed that Mayor Segarra was the first big-city mayor to be married to a man, but of course that isn&#8217;t true, and then rephrased it that he was the first big-city mayor to be a man married to a man, although as far as I know there are no big-city mayors who are women married to women and I wanted to include such marriages and mayors in the category (as they should be). Then I typed that Mayor Segarra was the first big-city mayor to be married to his own sex, which is far worse than what I actually went with up there. Hmph. Suggestions for improving the wording gratefully appreciated, but I guess I need to give up and use <I>gay-married<\/i>. End Digression.\n<p>Anyway, Mayor Segarra advanced to the Mayor&#8217;s office last summer, he was already the first openly gay Mayor in the city&#8217;s history and one of only a few gay big-city Mayors  in the country. The next day, he married his boyfriend, and made history&#8212;except that nobody noticed or cared. OK, that&#8217;s not true, but it&#8217;s surprisingly close to being true. The Mayor of Hartford married his long-term boyfriend, and it wasn&#8217;t a scandal, or a controversy, or anything like that. Out here in the suburb, almost a mile from the borderline, I barely noticed. Of course, it was a trifle overshadowed by the previous Mayor being convicted on felony counts, but still, there were articles about the new guy, and I don&#8217;t remember anybody making a fuss about him being gay, or about him getting married.\n<p>And when you are talking about society and culture, I think there&#8217;s a difference between being Mayor and being <I>elected<\/i> Mayor; there was somewhat of a history of women being appointed to elective office before they were elected to it, which was revealing about the world they were in. Similarly, it was possible (and I suppose still technically is possible) that our city would stand for a gay appointed Mayor in an emergency, but that given an election, would just happen to choose somebody straight. Didn&#8217;t happen.\n<p>I don&#8217;t read the <i>Advocate<\/i> any more, and I am well out of touch on a lot of gay rights issues. I think I get a lot of the headlines and the most talked-about stories through my network of friends, but of course I don&#8217;t know what I am missing, by the nature of it. So I&#8217;ll ask GR&#8217;s: is Mayor Segarra a gay hero? An icon of political success? If not, why not? Isn&#8217;t it newsworthy that all of this isn&#8217;t newsworthy?\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Which Your Humble Blogger also notes that the local paper has admirably refrained from coy locutions about the Mayor&#8217;s Spouse being the First Whatever of the City.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[202],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-item"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13833","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13833"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13833\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19413,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13833\/revisions\/19413"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}