{"id":13968,"date":"2012-02-02T21:40:25","date_gmt":"2012-02-03T02:40:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2012\/02\/02\/13968.html"},"modified":"2018-03-13T19:03:42","modified_gmt":"2018-03-14T00:03:42","slug":"give-him-the-hook","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2012\/02\/02\/give-him-the-hook\/","title":{"rendered":"Give him the hook"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Maybe I should write something about Mitt Romney and the gaffe.\n<p>First of all, what the hell is a <I>gaffe<\/i>, anyway? And why does it have a silent <i>e<\/i> on the end? What&#8217;s wrong with a good old-fashioned gaff? What are we, Frenchmen?\n<p>Well, <I>gaffe<\/i> comes from the French, who evidently use it more or less the way we do, as (according to the OED <I>an instance of clumsy stupidity<\/i>. I think it landed here in the bed created for it by the e-less <I>gaff<\/i> as in <I>blow the gaff<\/i>, to reveal a secret, or <I>stand the gaff<\/i>, to, as the OED puts it, receive severe criticism. It&#8217;s possible that <I>stand the gaff<\/i> and <i>blow the gaff<\/i> are not actually connected, except in the sense that <I>gaff<\/i> was loud and course talk, or possibly merry talk, all the same as <I>guff<\/i> or <i>gab<\/i>.\n<p>Anyway, I bring up <i>stand the gaff<\/i> to point out that a gaffe, properly speaking, is not just a verbal blunder as one might think from a narrow definition, but anything that causes a strong negative reaction <I>as if<\/i> it were a verbal blunder. Taegan Goddard&#8217;s definition over at his <a href=\"http:\/\/politicaldictionary.com\/words\/gaffe\/\">political dictionary<\/a> requires that it causes embarrassment, although he also requires that it be an unintentional statement, which I think is not necessarily the case. Was it a gaffe when Our Only Vice-President said that the Affordable Care Act was a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2010\/03\/23\/12934.html\">big fucking deal<\/a>? Yes. Was it unintentional? Well, he didn&#8217;t mean for <I>everybody<\/i> to hear it, so I suppose it wasn&#8217;t intentional in that sense, but was what he meant to say, and it was true, besides. Was it a gaffe when Senator McCain said that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2008\/10\/03\/11510.html\">the fundamentals of the economy were sound<\/a>? Yes. But it was completely intentional. Was it a gaffe when Barack Obama said he had visited fifty-seven states? No, because nobody heard about it or cared. Was it a gaffe when Jessica Simpson told the Secretary of the Interior that she liked the way Secretary Norton had decorated the White House? Yes and no; it certainly wasn&#8217;t unintentional, exactly, and it&#8217;s hard to believe that she could have been embarrassed at that stage, but people did react to it with mockery and scorn.\n<p>This is why I agree with the first of Greg Marx&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cjr.org\/campaign_desk\/three_thoughts_on_mitt_romneys.php\">Three Thoughts<\/a>: <I>We need a better typology of &#8220;gaffes&#8221;<\/i>. As he points out, there&#8217;s a big difference between a gaffe such as <I>I like being able to fire people<\/i>, where the media take a half-sentence out of context, a gaffe such as <i>I&#8217;m not concerned about the very poor<\/i>, where the wording accidentally says something the speaker did not intend to say, and a gaffe such as <i>Don&#8217;t try and stop the foreclosure process; let it run its course and hit the bottom<\/i>, where he conveys his meaning quite accurately, but that communication turns out to be embarrassingly unpopular.\n<p>When Our Only President, back before, said that people in the small towns of the industrial region &#8220;get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren&#8217;t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations&#8221;, it was clearly a gaffe. When he said that he had visited fifty-seven states, <i>that<\/i> was a gaffe. It would be helpful, in the future, to know if we&#8217;re talking about something closer to the former than the latter.\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Which Your Humble Blogger thinks that Left Blogovia should start calling him <I>Mitte<\/i>, for no reason whatsoever.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[204],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13968","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13968","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13968"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13968\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19490,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13968\/revisions\/19490"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13968"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13968"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13968"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}