{"id":13998,"date":"2012-02-28T17:41:02","date_gmt":"2012-02-28T22:41:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2012\/02\/28\/13998.html"},"modified":"2018-03-13T19:03:43","modified_gmt":"2018-03-14T00:03:43","slug":"public-access-if-anybody-knows","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2012\/02\/28\/public-access-if-anybody-knows\/","title":{"rendered":"Public Access, if anybody knows where they are"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Your Humble Blogger has been hoping to type something about the death of the <a href=\"http:\/\/thomas.loc.gov\/cgi-bin\/query\/z?c112:H.R.3699:\">Research Works Act<\/a>. But I was hoping to type something that would perhaps clarify the immensely complicated stuff around it, and I don&#8217;t have time to do anything like that at the moment. So I&#8217;ll just ask for a tiny bit of it&#8212;as I was enumerating, in my head, the many things that a journal publisher does that largely remains undone when scholars put together on-line journals, amongst the things that I hadn&#8217;t thought of before is that the publishers often will make it easy for libraries to include on-line works in their digital collections. Perhaps expensive, particularly when the publisher is evil, but easy.\n<p>For one thing, the really large (and mostly evil) publishers have their own databases of articles; a library can link to those databases in a variety of ways, including within the on-line catalogue. Of course, an individual on-line journal can contact the library, and then the library can catalogue the thing and link to it, but that&#8217;s one of those things that I think gets left undone most of the time. A publisher not only has an incentive to contact the library, but has a big old list of libraries to contact, and perhaps has ongoing contacts with humans who work there. And even then, a link from a catalogue line is a very different matter than inclusion in the big searchable databases; again, I don&#8217;t know to what extent a small publisher can get a journal included in such databases, but certainly it&#8217;s more up the publisher&#8217;s alley than the scholar&#8217;s. And, of course, it&#8217;s different field to field; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/\">PubMed<\/a> will be very different from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gale.cengage.com\/PeriodicalSolutions\/academicOnefile.htm\">Academic OneFile<\/a>; publishers will likely be doing different tasks, field to field, and have experience in their own fields.\n<p>So. While I think most academics and academic librarians would like to have something like PubMed or ERIC, huge government-run databases that will include any upstart (peer-reviewed) journal (after appropriate review), where those do not exist or where they are insufficiently inclusive (and I have no idea if those big government-run databases are really sufficiently inclusive) (and sufficiently exclusive to make their inclusivity useful) or where they do not cover what the journal covers, what is useful to librarians? I mean, yes, it&#8217;s useful for a journal not to be published by one of the Bad Guys (and there really are some big bad guys), but beyond that, what&#8217;s good? Because Google Scholar just isn&#8217;t going to cut it, guys.\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Which Your Humble Blogger declines to name names, but the initials in question are <strong>Reed Elsevier<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[198],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13998","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libraries"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13998","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13998"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13998\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19508,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13998\/revisions\/19508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}