{"id":14067,"date":"2012-05-10T16:16:12","date_gmt":"2012-05-10T20:16:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2012\/05\/10\/14067.html"},"modified":"2018-03-13T19:03:47","modified_gmt":"2018-03-14T00:03:47","slug":"we-are-all-in-the-dumps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2012\/05\/10\/we-are-all-in-the-dumps\/","title":{"rendered":"We Are All in the Dumps"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>One of the nice things about the online social network stuff is that sometimes, when a piece of news occurs, I can peek into the reactions of my acquaintances (and their acquaintances, and sometimes of perfect strangers) and see how they overlap with mine. A couple of days ago, I was reading posts and status updates reacting to the news that Maurice Sendak has died.\n<p>It seems that <I>Where the Wild Things Are<\/I> is the touchstone book for a generation and a half or so, and it has my favorite book in the whole wide world for a couple of years, now. It&#8217;s a wonderful, wonderful work, and people think Maurice Sendak as the man who wrote <i>Wild Things<\/i>, that&#8217;s wonderful. But <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2009\/08\/29\/12340.html\">YHB has written about the book before<\/a>, so I thought I would mention a few others of his that have touched me.\n<p>It doesn&#8217;t have quite the heft of <I>Wild Things<\/i>, but for both visuals and story, I think <I>In the Night Kitchen<\/i> is a better book&#8212;it wasn&#8217;t until I had read and reread <I>Wild Things<\/I> a million times that it took first place in my personal ranking. Back in 2004, when my Perfect Non-Reader was not yet five, I said that <i>Night Kitchen<\/i> is the best children&#8217;s book ever, and it is a remarkable work in every way. Also, the Bakers (who bake &#8217;til the dawn so that we can have cake in the morn) are at the pinnacle of picture book characters. It is sometimes considered as part of a trilogy with <I>Wild Things<\/I> and <I>Outside Over There<\/i>; three books that feature the child protagonist on a fantastical journey, in extraordinary danger, and then returned home. Of course, description fits a lot of books, so I have never been satisfied with the idea of the three as a trilogy. They are very different books, with very different themes, both visually and spiritually. <I>Night Kitchen<\/i> is the most light-hearted, possibly the most light-hearted of all his books (hmm, not true, must go back to that) and the visuals and the rhythm imbue it with a swing that is utterly unlike the other two. Which is to say: I have never cried while reading <I>Night Kitchen<\/i>.\n<p>I didn&#8217;t see any mentions of the illustrated nursery rhymes. I know some people who are very fond of <I>Higgledy Piggledy Pop<\/i>, which has (if I remember correctly) the illustrated rhyme at the end. My favorite of those is <I>We Are All in the Dumps with Jack and Guy<\/i>, a truly remarkable book, very serious and powerful, and I think the most underrated (or perhaps underloved) of his books. I didn&#8217;t like <i>Hector Protector and As I Went Over the Water<\/i> as much, nor what I vaguely remember as a book of Mother Goose rhymes. But it seems like not so many people have seen <I>All in the Dumps<\/i>, and it&#8217;s very much worth seeking out.\n<p>What did turn up in comments was the Nutshell collection and its adaptation as <I>Really, Rosie<\/i>; the books\/songs are <I>Alligators All Around<\/i>, <i>Pierre<\/i>, <I>One Was Johnny<\/i>, and the book that was YHB&#8217;s favorite in 1973, <I>Chicken Soup with Rice<\/i>. These are wonderful little books, and while they aren&#8217;t Great Big Books, they are wonderful little books, and it&#8217;s a Good Thing to have some wonderful little books around the house. Also, both <I>Chicken Soup<\/i> and <I>Alligators<\/i> are light-hearted books; Maurice Sendak gets (well-deserved) credit for children&#8217;s books that don&#8217;t necessarily need to be light-hearted, but then sometimes light-hearted is what you looking for.\n<p>Another thing that turned up among my friends&#8217; memories that didn&#8217;t turn up so much in the articles and obituaries were the illustrations for books that Mr. Sendak didn&#8217;t write. The <I>Little Bear<\/i> series, of course, is a big deal for a lot of people, and the instantly recognizable illustrations are a big part of that. There are dozens of books with Sendak illustrations, and often the illustrations are a big part of the emotional attachment, either from reading as a kid or from reading aloud to kids. <i>No Fighting, No Biting<\/i> and <i>What Do You Say, Dear<\/i> fall into this category for me, and although there aren&#8217;t as many illustrations, I think that I was predisposed to fall for <i>The Wheel on the School<\/i> because those illustrations were Mr. Sendak&#8217;s.\n<p>It&#8217;s not wrong for the obituaries to highlight <I>Wild Thing<\/i>, which is an Important Book and so on and so forth, but it&#8217;s really nice for me, as a fan of his work, to see the idiosyncratic loves people had for some of the other stuff. I don&#8217;t really get Social Networks, but that&#8217;s one cool thing that wouldn&#8217;t happen without them. For instance, it took me three days to write up a blog note about it, while I jotted off a status update referencing <I>Night Kitchen<\/i> in thirty seconds, to have it take its place among the other such lines&#8212;it&#8217;s the accumulation of them that made me cry.\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Which Your Humble Blogger is in the dumps for diamonds are trumps and the kittens are gone to St. Paul&#8217;s. The baby is bit, The moon&#8217;s in a fit, and the houses are built without walls.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[199],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-litchrachoor"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14067"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14067\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19550,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14067\/revisions\/19550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}