{"id":14869,"date":"2014-03-20T14:56:46","date_gmt":"2014-03-20T18:56:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2014\/03\/20\/14869.html"},"modified":"2018-03-13T19:10:10","modified_gmt":"2018-03-14T00:10:10","slug":"could-someone-pinch-me-please","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2014\/03\/20\/could-someone-pinch-me-please\/","title":{"rendered":"Could someone pinch me please? (Ouch, he didn&#8217;t mean it)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Well, and perhaps it&#8217;s worth sharing Your Humble Blogger&#8217;s experience with the <cite>Annie<\/cite> announcement. A couple of weeks ago, Columbia Pictures released a trailer, and I saw it on the Guarniad website. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/film\/2014\/mar\/06\/annie-remake-quvenzhane-wallis-trailer-released\">article<\/a>, like a lot of the discussion, highlighted the casting of Quvenzhan\u00e9 Wallis, which seemed odd to me, because (1) not having seen <a href=\"http:\/\/www.beastsofthesouthernwild.com\/\">the movie<\/a> I have no connection with the kid, except she seems to be cute&#8212;but then I would scarcely expect them to cast a kid who wasn&#8217;t superlatively cute, and (b) nobody really cares who is playing the title role in that show.\n<p>Seriously, if I hear about a production of <cite>Annie<\/cite>, my first question is <I>who is Hannigan<\/i>, and then <I>who is Rooster<\/i> and then maybe <i>who is Warbucks<\/i> and <I>is there anybody else in it<\/i>, meaning Grace and Lily and FDR. Or Bert Healy! An awesome cameo opportunity there. I would be interested in knowing who is playing Bert Healy, long before it would occur to me to ask the name of the kid. I would just assume that I hadn&#8217;t heard of the kid, because kid. Eleven years old, right? Maybe ten. The odds that I have ever heard of the kid are slight, and are totally unconnected to the odds of the kid being terrific&#8212;not that a Hannigan I have never heard of could never be terrific, but I would go to see Faith Prince or Queen Latifah or Tracey Ullman to see what they would do with Hannigan. I wouldn&#8217;t go see some eleven-year-old kid to see what they would do with Annie. It&#8217;s not that kind of role.\n<p>And in this movie, they have cast Cameron Diaz as Hannigan. A terrible, terrible choice. I hates it. I don&#8217;t like Ms. Diaz very much at all, but I certainly don&#8217;t like her as Miss Hannigan. Nor did the trailer ease my mind about that in the slightest&#8212;we don&#8217;t hear her sing or see her dance, and her desperate shrewishness isn&#8217;t funny in the slightest. Jamie Foxx as the Daddy Warbucks character is fine but not exciting; I expect he will be better than Albert Finney but not as good as Keene Curtis. You know? Fine. And I didn&#8217;t see anybody else I know&#8212;someone named Rose Byrne is Grace and turns out to be someone I have seen in things but don&#8217;t recognize or remember. IMDB claims that Bobby Cannavale is in it (as the Rooster character? Maybe?) but I didn&#8217;t spot him in the trailer. So pretty much an awful cast, as far as I can tell.\n<p>And then, there&#8217;s the Big Problem. The show is set in the present day. It was always a period piece, of course, made charming by the comic representation of Depression-Era poverty. Hooverville and an orphanage and a stray dog. Jokes about Fiorello LaGuardia and Harold Ickes and the beautiful Boylan Sisters. It works as a period piece. The charming Depression-Era poverty is charming because it&#8217;s Depression-Era; at the end of the show we have a New Deal for Christmas and we don&#8217;t have orphans any more. That&#8217;s what makes the show work. I don&#8217;t mean to say that isn&#8217;t in some sense problematic, what with rich people paying a hundred bucks a ticket to be told that we solved poverty eighty years ago, but whether or no, it&#8217;s what makes the show work. Putting it in the present day makes it charmless, uncharming, anti-charming, really. Daddy Warbucks renting an orphan for a Public Relations Christmas is not clueless but despicable in the current context. And how do you end the thing? How do you solve not only Annie&#8217;s problem but the country&#8217;s? Does Barack Obama get Mitch McConnell to sing &#8220;Tomorrow&#8221;? I think not. I mean, not now. In sixty years, sure, that would be funny and charming. Not now. Not in the slightest.\n<p>So. What have we got? A terribly misguided movie updating with an awful cast, is what we&#8217;ve got. Yech. I couldn&#8217;t be less excited. Oh, and there&#8217;s no lyricist being featured as updating or replacing the topical songs (&#8220;We&#8217;d Like to Thank You, Herbert Hoover&#8221; and &#8220;NYC&#8221; and &#8220;A New Deal for Christmas&#8221; at least), so there&#8217;s nothing to be excited about there, either. Although IMDB lists Emma Thompson as a third Screenplay author, so that&#8217;s potentially a Good Thing (her Nanny McPhee screenplays were quite good), which makes it all of one potential good thing to set against the rest. Not enough.\n<p>But really, I didn&#8217;t mean to write this much about why the <cite>Annie<\/cite> movie looks so terrible to me. The reason I did write all of that is that I am feeling defensive about it, because as I was making my initial response known, other people were making their initial responses known, and quite a few people responded <i>Yech<\/i> based on&#8230; Annie being black. Now, one thing about the internet is that a double-handful of jerks and trolls can look like a trend while actually being, you know, a double-handful of jerks and trolls. Still, I felt awkward because my initial <I>Yech<\/i> probably sounded a lot like the initial <I>Yech<\/i> of the jerks and trolls. And why wouldn&#8217;t it? How would anyone know the difference? And it led me to ask myself, was there a difference?\n<P>Fundamentally, yes. I don&#8217;t object to the casting of the title role, I just don&#8217;t really care about the casting of the title role. Is it possible that&#8212;unconsciously, since I am aware only of not really caring&#8212;I was put off by the casting of a black Annie? Or, more probably and troubling, that my preference for <cite>Annie<\/cite> as a period piece necessitates a white Annie, and therefore is as one with the white default that is in the end so harmful to non-white folk? Because, really, things are much more complicated than refraining from going <I>A Black Annie? Yech!<\/i> out in public where anyone can hear you.\n<p>And even if it isn&#8217;t me, personally&#8212;I am still on the side of the bad guys, and that makes me uneasy as well. Can I be right if they are so obviously wrong and we have the same answer? I mean, yes, obviously, I can be right if I am right and it doesn&#8217;t actually matter what other people think, but also, maybe not so much that? At any rate I feel it incumbent upon me to defend my response as not being like the racist responses. So I have.\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Which Your Humble Blogger&#8217;s clothes may be Beau Brommel-y, but that doesn&#8217;t make a fellow fully dressed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[201],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-navel-gazing"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14869"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14869\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16624,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14869\/revisions\/16624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}