{"id":15401,"date":"2016-10-26T16:03:55","date_gmt":"2016-10-26T20:03:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kith.org\/journals\/vardibidian\/2016\/10\/26\/15401.html"},"modified":"2018-03-13T19:10:55","modified_gmt":"2018-03-14T00:10:55","slug":"a-griping-list-though","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/2016\/10\/26\/a-griping-list-though\/","title":{"rendered":"A Griping List, though"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>I object to the premise of <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.oup.com\/2016\/10\/ultimate-reading-list-librarians\/\">this OUP blognote purporting to have <i>The ultimate reading list, created by librarians<\/i><\/a>. It isn&#8217;t.\n<p>What they appear to have done is ask a bunch of people at the UKSG conference (I have no idea what <a href=\"http:\/\/www.uksg.org\/\">UKSG<\/a> even stands for) <i> which one book couldn&#8217;t you live without?<\/i> They collated the results and call it the ultimate reading list. (I also dispute the librarians part&#8212;whatever the letters stand for, UKSG claims to include librarians, publishers, intermediaries and technology vendors. I do understand that the ultimate reading list, created by intermediaries, would have generated fewer clicks. I, for one, wouldn&#8217;t have bothered linking to it in querulous complaint.)\n<p>The list is fine. A quarter or so written by women, maybe an eighth not-originally-in-the-English-language, a bunch of children&#8217;s books, a bunch of Classics, a bunch of recent novels, a bunch of memoirs. It&#8217;s an interesting list as a document of what people at such a conference would tell Oxford University Press that they couldn&#8217;t live without. It isn&#8217;t a reading list.\n<p>I mean, what is a reading list? In some sense, I suppose, it&#8217;s just a list of books, so in that sense, it obviously is a reading list. In actual use, a reading list is a list of readings for a course on a particular subject, that the instructor expects the students to complete (or at least fake). More Recently, we use the phrase for a curated list of valuable readings either on a particular topic or for a particular purpose. A reading list of PoC specfic. A reading list for understanding what&#8217;s going on in Aleppo. A reading list for QUILTBAG teens, a reading list for climate change deniers, a reading list for the contemporary drama. A summer reading list is about as vague and undefined as such a list can usefully be. What&#8217;s I&#8217;m on about for my purposes, though, is that it&#8217;s a list <i>for other people to read<\/i>.\n<p>That&#8217;s not what this is. If I were to be asked <i>Vardibidian, which one book couldn&#8217;t you live without?<\/i> my answers would be personal. Scripture, of course, although if I had to name a single book, it would probably be the <I>Avot<\/i>, and then we have the question of if I consider the Mishnah to be Scripture. If I had to live without <cite>The Curse of Chalion<\/cite> or <cite>The Mask of Apollo<\/cite> or <cite>The Hobbit<\/cite> or my other comfort books, that would stink. I would have been very unhappy trying to raise a child without <cite>Hop on Pop<\/cite> or <cite>Where the Wild Things Are<\/cite>. I have the OED at home and use it, although mostly I use the on-line version (since I have access through my employer). My <i>Tanach<\/i> is the Heinz\/JPS, my siddur is <cite>Mishkan T&#8217;filah<\/cite>. My preferred road map was Rand-McNally, back before the pocket computer took care of all that.\n<p>That&#8217;s great information for y&#8217;all to know about me. It&#8217;s interesting information to know about lots of people. It&#8217;s not a reading list.\n<p>And if, as the blognote says, many participants took the question seriously, it&#8217;s an even worse reading list. There&#8217;s no point in reading a whole bunch of books because a lot of quite varied individuals each picked one. That doesn&#8217;t make a list at all. If twenty people each picked a song, it wouldn&#8217;t make a playlist&#8212;I&#8217;d be surprised if it was a listenable hour of music.\n<p>Or perhaps I&#8217;m just grouchy.\n<p><I>Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus<\/I>,<br>-Vardibidian.\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Which Your Humble Blogger makes of a molehill a mountain. A tiny, tiny mountain.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[196],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15401","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hatchet-job"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15401"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15401\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16364,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15401\/revisions\/16364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kith.org\/vardibidian\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}