Song of Songs: Chapter Four, verses six-eleven

Song of Songs, Chapter Four, verse six: Until the day break, and the shadows flee away, I will get me to the mountain of myrrh, and to the hill of frankincense.

Er. I’ll point out that while myrrh is generally in Scripture used to talk about sweet sexy smells, frankincense is mostly used in sacrifices. I think they both, and particularly both together, are meant to indicate wealth, even metaphorical wealth, that is, richness in love. A mountain of myrrh. Whew!

Chapter Four, verse seven: Thou [art] all fair, my love; [there is] no spot in thee.

Speaking of sacrifices, it is of course only those animals without blemish that can be sacrificed. And only those people without blemish that can perform the sacrifice. Of course, all this is within the context of the catalogue of body parts in the last bit, so it makes sense that it would conclude with, er, a conclusion.

Chapter Four, verse eight: Come with me from Lebanon, [my] spouse, with me from Lebanon: look from the top of Amana, from the top of Shenir and Hermon, from the lions' dens, from the mountains of the leopards.

Spouse here is kallah, bride, but I think betrothed is probably what’s going on here. I think, by the way, the Song of Songs is a strong impetus for the inclusion of the wedding in the obligations of Judaism:

These are the obligations without measure, whose reward, too, is without measure: To honor mother and father, to perform acts of lovingkindness, to attend the house of study daily, to welcome the stranger, to visit the sick, to rejoice with the bride and bridegroom, to comfort the bereaved, to pray with sincerity, to make peace when there is strife. And the study of Torah is equal to them all.
The study of Torah is equal to them all only because (according to the Rabbis) it leads to them all. Including the rejoicing at weddings.

Chapter Four, verse nine: Thou hast ravished my heart, my sister, [my] spouse; thou hast ravished my heart with one of thine eyes, with one chain of thy neck.

I know that my sister, my spouse is kinda ewwy, but there is this sense, I think particularly in a society where men and women lead largely separate lives, that people know their siblings better than anyone else. And isn’t there a sense that a lover might wish to have grown up with his beloved, to have seen her first steps, to have taught her to shoot hoops and play candyland, to have comforted her after her first fall off a bicycle. I take this talk in that sense. There is, also, The Analogy, where if we are not, in fact, experiencing pillow talk but theological talk, both sister and spouse are metaphors expressing closeness, and sister is in some sense more permanent, starting earlier and lasting lifelong.

Chapter Four, verse ten: How fair is thy love, my sister, [my] spouse! how much better is thy love than wine! and the smell of thine ointments than all spices!

An odd thing here, for us who pray in Hebrew, is the phrase mah tovu, usually translated how goodly in Num 24:5, How goodly are thy tents, O Jacob, [and] thy tabernacles, O Israel! That’s the first prayer of the morning service at the temple; in fact, some folk say the line the moment they walk in through the doors of a synagogue. It’s what Bala’am says instead of cursing, of course. It’s an odd resonance, particularly if we have The Analogy in the back of our minds.

Chapter Four, verse eleven: Thy lips, O [my] spouse, drop [as] the honeycomb: honey and milk [are] under thy tongue; and the smell of thy garments [is] like the smell of Lebanon.

An odd thing is that in Scriptures, generally, they don’t talk about how people smell. OK, that’s not all that odd. But there are a few places. The Bridge and Bridegroom, obviously, are just eighteen kinds of odoriffic, all of them good. Isaac the Blind—y’all remember the story, yes?—doesn’t just feel Jacob’s faux-hairy arms but smells him, and says he smells like Esau. Oops. And in Jeremiah, the prophet mentions that Moab, here talked about as a person, has remained unchanged, even his smell hasn’t changed. So there’s a pattern here of knowing a person by the smell of them, which frankly is something that a lot of pr0n writers forget to include.

chazak, chazak, v’nitchazek,
-Vardibidian.

3 thoughts on “Song of Songs: Chapter Four, verses six-eleven

  1. Matt Hulan

    See, part of this is why, in my mind anyway, Judaism is infinitely superior to Christianity. Both say something like:

    honor mother and father… perform acts of lovingkindness… welcome the stranger… visit the sick… rejoice with the bride and bridegroom… comfort the bereaved… pray with sincerity… make peace when there is strife…

    But Judaism couches that inside:

    These are the obligations without measure, whose reward, too, is without measure… And the study of Torah is equal to them all.

    And throws in:

    Attend the house of study daily…

    Whereas Xianity doesn’t particularly WANT educated people, and follows their version of the Golden Rule up with:

    Or you’re going to Hell.

    [rant](Oh noes! Is the big bad Daddy In the Sky going to give me a Cosmic Spanking if I spill my Milk of Human Kindness all over the Carpet of… um… I don’t know. Aunt Soul? What the hell is Xianity talking about, anyway?!?)[/rant]

    peace
    Matt

    Reply
  2. Vardibidian

    Well, to be fair, Christianity does have a rather nice story about the King of Kings being born in a barn, homeless, impoverished and outcast, naked, helpless and blind. Or so I’ve heard. At my own synagogue last night, our rabbi evidently lectured about how evil Jimmy Carter is.

    And there are lots of rabbis who will tell you more about going to hell than about reward without measure. And, I’m sure, lots of pastors and priests and lay leaders who will tell you more about attending the house of study than about eternal punishment. But sure, I take your point.

    Thanks,
    -V.

    Reply
  3. Matt Hulan

    And, in fairness, I take your point. But why be fair when you can be sarcastic and strident?

    You know, it’s funny, when I think of The Jesus Story, I see it as just another harvest god story. Xipe Totec, Apollo, Osiris, Dammusz, Jesus. Same guy, as far as I’m concerned.

    But, the whole King of Kings thing is a nice twist, if you follow the Line of David/Rebel Leader/Failed Israeli Messiah story, rather than the He Is Risen aspect of the story.

    peace
    Matt

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Vardibidian Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.