Lack of updates

Sorry for the relative paucity of substantive entries lately. I can't really talk about the three or four most stressful things that are going on in my life, and I haven't felt up to journalling about other stuff.

A few things for now:

I'm halfway through the three-week period in which six different out-of-town friends are visiting. That's gone well so far (though sadly, I've entirely missed the visit of one of them), but for that and a few other reasons I've had a fair bit more group social interaction lately than I'd been having for a while. On the one hand, seeing friends good! On the other hand, it's tiring; I'm an introvert. (There's a meme going around in which people take some new rendition of an online Meyers-Briggs test; I'm not gonna bother with this new version, but my traditional results are IN*J, with the * indicating a pretty even balance for T/F.)

Took a vacation day from work on Tuesday to try to relax and de-stress a little. Was nice. Also oddly productive: I'm now, for the first time ever, seven weeks ahead on finalizing stories for SH. Also in the last few days, Mary Anne's helped me pick out and put up curtains in both bedrooms (with Kam's help too); we finished getting them up on Tuesday, and they definitely help block light in my room in the morning. I'm not yet sure whether they help enough; I slept badly both Tuesday night and last night, but that wasn't 'cause of too much light.

Mary Anne and I have seen two movies while she's been here. I'd recommend both of them, though these are not strong recommendations; worth seeing, but not works of genius or anything.

  • Intolerable Cruelty is the recent Coen Brothers movie (a romantic comedy about divorce, more or less) starring George Clooney and Catherine Zeta-Jones, with Geoffrey Rush and Billy-Bob Thornton in smaller parts; not one of the Coen Brothers' most brilliant outings, but fun, and has a couple of nice twists and funny moments, and the actors are good. (I keep confusing the title with Cruel Intentions, which is totally unrelated.)
  • Mona Lisa Smile features Julia Roberts as an idealistic and progressive young art history professor at Wellesley in 1953; better than I expected from the previews, with some very nice moments and several unusual aspects despite telling a fairly ordinary overall story. And even that isn't quite as ordinary as I expected; I was expecting a female version of Dead Poets Society, but I think there's more to it than that.

Sometime in the last several days I think I figured out what was wrong with the layout code for the show-latest-comments version of my main journal page; I'd appreciate it if folks would take a look at the test version and let me know if it looks okay. You can post a comment (though not in LJ) or send me email; let me know your browser name and version number, and your operating system name and version number, and whether the page has any weird text overprinting or huge gaps of vertical space. I still haven't decided what to do about displaying the entry title, number of comments, and timestamp; I haven't come up with a way to show them all on one line that I like, so if you have any suggestions about that, let me know.

Finally, speaking of comments (and memes, as I was earlier), I rather like this, which I picked up from supergee and metasilk:

Invent a memory of me and post it in the comments. It can be anything you want, so long as it's something that's never happened. Then, of course, post this to your journal and see what people would like to remember of you, only the universe failed to cooperate in making it happen so they had to make it up instead.

I would add that it doesn't actually have to be a memory you would like to have had; any made-up memory of me is fine. Also a reminder that if you're reading this in LJ, you should follow the link to my journal page to post comments.

11 Responses to “Lack of updates”

  1. Jennifer

    One of these days, I’ll catch “Mona Lisa Smile” when it hits cable, but I didn’t feel like shelling out money to see a movie that my alma mater felt compelled to apologize for.

    reply
  2. Jed

    What did they apologize about?

    reply
  3. Dan

    There was that one lunch at a Greek place in San Francisco, when you leaned back and opened your mouth for an enourmous belch. It was so shockingly out of character, as far as I knew of you, that the memory stuck with me.

    Ahh, yes, things that never happened.

    As far as the new look goes, looks very nice! Only three notes: the comments sidebar appears to be picking up comments from PoI, too, a couple more of the latest comments would be nice, and it might be good to indent the entry listings to set them off from the text at top (“Last 12 entries:”) and bottom (“Or choose a date:”)

    reply
  4. silversmoke

    Mozilla 1.3
    Not sure which version of Linux, I’m at a terminal at a restaurant.

    Layout looks fine; very clean, with no overlaps or table issues.

    You may find this link useful: http://www.anybrowser.com/siteviewer.html

    Now, if only you’d add some colors!! Ah well, I read you from my livejournal anyway.

    -Ariana

    reply
  5. Jed

    Okay, I’ve made some further changes; thanks for the comments!

    I think I’m going back to using a table for the layout. Which do you like better: table version or two-line version?

    reply
  6. Jenn Reese

    I vaguely prefer the table version. Since the date isn’t really important to me (I check multiple times a day anyway), it takes up too much space in the two-line version — I prefer getting more info “above the fold.”

    However, the two-line version looks nice, so I would have no problem if you chose that one. 🙂

    reply
  7. silversmoke

    I’m leaning towards the table version. It’s easier to skim, and seems cleaner. I really do like the latest comments feature.

    reply
  8. metasilk

    Let’s see…

    Look:
    Table version (Have you seen E. Tufte’s books about visual displays of information?) I dig the “lastest commments” sidebar.

    Memory:
    I remember your green pajamas with the plaid rabbits. Where in the *world* did you find them? Comfy, but they do clash with your bathrobe.

    reply
  9. Vardibidian

    Do you remember that time where we were at that place with what’s-his-name? And there were all those guys there, and that woman with the hat? Ah, good times…

    I slightly prefer the table layout, but don’t have strong feelings (other than gratitude, of course).

                                                               ,
    -Vardibidian.

    reply
  10. Jed

    Dan: Yeah, that surprised me too. But not nearly so much as when that waiter covered my mouth and said “Excuse yourself!”

    Ariana: Thanks! I hadn’t seen siteviewer before; I think it’s not quite the best tool for my purposes at the moment (and it seems a little out of date), but it’ll be handy for future reference.

    Do you have any suggestions for colors? I tend not to do a lot with colors, partly just ’cause I’m partly red/green colorblind.

    Everyone: thanks for the tables vs two-line comments. Tables seem to be the clear winner, so I’ll go with those.

    metasilk: I’ve read some Tufte, but not his latest. Good stuff. Were you asking where I found the plaid rabbits (answer: Scotland), or where I found the green pajamas (answer: Greenland)? Re clashing: see above comment re colorblindness. 🙂

    Vardibidian: I don’t remember that time, but I do remember the woman with the hat. I’ve never seen a hat that actually wrapped around an entire body before.

    reply
  11. Michael

    Table version, please. Definitely feels easier to skim and easier to find a particular entry. And the recent comments feature is great.

    reply

Join the Conversation