Scatter ye your links upon the waters

      5 Comments on Scatter ye your links upon the waters

Clearly, Your Humble Blogger will never again have the opportunity to devote a period of sustained concentration to thinking, or for that matter to typing. I am just about able to bookmark the odd thing of interest, to indicate to myself the possibility of perhaps thinking about it, and then perhaps, if I thought any particularly thinky thoughts, writing about it. Sadly, this will not happen. So, just in case some Gentle Reader would like to think my thinky thoughts for me, here are some of the things I have considered thinking about recently...

  • Mark Schmitt had a long piece in Democracy called Mismatching Funds. Let’s be clear—I didn’t even finish reading this one.
  • Among the zillion potentially-interesting things brought to my attention by the Foreign Policy blog was this note on the demographics of the Middle East (and China), pointing out that a majority of men are still single by the time they reach 30. I think I would have had something to say about demographics and numbers, possibly in conjunction with the article I didn’t bookmark about how there were more unmarried women than married women in America, and how that was so clearly a totally different thing.
  • A note by Matthew Yglesias about Teams mentions that Senator Clinton has essentially retained the more interventionist elements of President Clinton’s foreign policy team, but Barack Obama has some of the “less militaristic ones”. This reminded me that I don’t think I have mentioned Your Massive Election Central Guide To 2008 Prez Campaign Staffs. They claim that they will be updating it regularly, but ... not so much, lately. Well, they’ve been busy. Anyway, the list is mostly baffling at this point, because I haven’t done the important step of finding out who the hell everybody is. But when I keep hocking about how important it is to know who the candidates advisors will be? These people probably won’t be in the inner circle of policy advisors, but they very likely have worked for the people who will be.
  • Just in case it comes up:
    Heut' kommt der Franz zu mir
    Freut sich die Lies.
    Ob er aber über Oberammergau
    Oder aber über Unterammergau
    Oder aber überhaupt nicht kommt
    Ist nicht gewiss
  • I came across The Wikipedia Game, and it sounds moderately entertaining, and besides, a useful introduction to the idea of hypertext. I may well be attempting to introduce a gentleman who is entirely unfamiliar with computers to the World Wide Web soon, and I am looking for tips and tricks. The problem will be (I think) the basic paradigm, which I learned so long ago I don’t remember not knowing it.
  • It is far too late to purchase things from the auction of Angels Star Collection of Film & TV Costumes, but I draw your attention to a truly unfortunate waistcoat. Nice sporran, though. On a philosophical note, discovering that many of the Doctor Who outfits were used for promotions only, rather than in the filming of episodes, radically decreased my interest in them. Why? I mean, the costumes were made by Angels, who made the used-in-filming costumes. They were made for the actors, and worn by them. They are real costumes, vaddevah dat means. But not real enough, somehow.
  • Those persons interested in the conversations recently about anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism, and about Judaism and Zionism, and all that, may well be nearly as fascinated as I was by the Foreward and Introduction to a 2005 web publication of Steve Cohen’s 1985 booklet That’s Funny, You Don’t Look Anti-Semitic. The host and publisher, Engage, decided to republish the thing, and then found out that, to quote from Jane Ashworth’s introduction, “he turned out an Introduction with which I hardly agree on any point.” They published it anyway.
  • The Republicans are part of an Internationalist movement? Who knew? (answer: Wikipedia, of course, and Mark Liberman over at the Language Log)
  • No link, but the question was brought up at Purim time: To what extent is Mordechai a model for the Diaspora Jew? To what extent is Persia under Ahasueros a model for what the Diaspora should be? Should a good Jew have knelt to Haman, rather than setting off a genocidal rampage? Should a good Jew have avoided Haman, rather than confronting him at the gate with a refusal to kneel?
  • George Lardner Jr. writes in the New York Times about the presidential pardon in A High Price for Freedom. He makes some good points, and lays out some interesting parts of the history, but he concludes by saying “No matter what one thinks of the folks in the White House, it seems clear that they have been put in a bind by the Supreme Court’s bad precedents.” Er, no. They have been put in a bind by breaking the law. True, the Supreme Court isn’t all that helpful, here, but they did not put Our Only President in a bind. As unofficial communications advisor to the next Democratic Administration, may I suggest the following memo go out to all staff to be appointed?
    As has been seen in recent years, the POTUS can be embarrassed by requests for pardons, and the decision whether or not to pardon a staff member has no good outcome. Therefore, in order to facilitate the advancement of our agenda, to govern effectively, and to serve our President and our Country, the White House requests that all employees follow the fucking laws, you cocksuckers!

Tolerabimus quod tolerare debemus,

5 thoughts on “Scatter ye your links upon the waters

  1. hibiscus

    click my name to get a free blog entry related to this blog entry. (i did the extra men item.)

    now. from the bottom,

    * if the president had been meant to follow the law, he wouldn’t have been given control of the justice department and the military.

    * googling “mordechai diaspora” gets a lot of hits.

    * that makes iran-contra an intra-company money transfer and so, totally okay.

    * i remain confident that the solution to mass killing is openness and interdependency, not isolation and tribalism; that there is no military defense against nuclear attack, regardless of the strength of the defense’s historical justification; and that this world is too small to have been created for the purpose of testing the purity of any given person’s commitment to ethnocentricity — such vanity is better explained by human will than by divine. that said, maybe cohen — anyone — would be angry with the poem i wrote, even though, as i read it again now, it seems basically anti-nothing. its error lies in blunt reference to horrors not in its logic.

    * everybody loves franz. franz go baa.

    * wikipedia game javascript widget!

    * huge comment stream on next president’s foreign policy and ZILCH about climate change. name “gore” appears TWENTY-FIVE TIMES and nobody brings it up as a foreign policy issue! how is that possible?

    * see link in name.

    * small donations, public funding, and apparently as few current republicans as possible.

  2. hibiscus

    relating to the last point on (re)public(an) malfeasance, i’ve been reading the entertainment directly on tmpmuckraker for fun.

    are you ready for this? this is so great! the storyline on the new gategate has developed a serious froth. here’s what is guessed:

    * monica goodling was having an affair with john ashcroft, and that’s why
    * monica goodling was on the public payroll doing “training” while working for the bush campaign and the RNC in the 2004 election, doing such good dirty work that
    * monica goodling was the nixonian purity tester for choosing the soaring legal eagles who were to be placed in the battleground states in advance of the 2008 election, leading
    * monica goodling to plead the fifth and pre-emptively claim martyrdom under the spiteful blinding lashing glare of evil partisan cruelty, and all this is funny because, ten years later,
    * monica goodling’s name is monica.

    moral: monica is a bad name.

  3. Matt Hulan

    Beautiful! I had hoped she was having an affair with Bush, so we could impeach him, not for breaking any of the important laws, nor for re-writing the Constitution as it suits him, but for getting blown in the Oval Office, as one should impeach a President.

    But Ashcroft is almost as good.


  4. hibiscus

    comment seen on salon:

    “If Whitewater was a fishing expedition, then I submit the Bush Administration is a full-blown national fucking whalewatch.”


Leave a Reply to Matt Hulan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.