Greenberg v. National Geographic
I had heard of the Tasini v. New York Times case (in which the NYT claimed it had a right to make authors' work available online as part of the NYT archive without further reimbursing authors), but hadn't heard about this related case: Greenberg v. National Geographic, in which National Geo claimed that they had a right to reissue the complete run of the magazine on CD-ROM without further reimbursing people like photographer Jerry Greenberg, who owned the copyrights on the photos he'd taken for them. Looks to me like the courts in general are leaning toward publishers needing to pay extra for electronic republication.