4 Responses to “More sf not to write”

  1. David Moles

    “Abysmally stupid for some other reason” is way too vague of a catch-all.

    reply
  2. David Moles

    As usual, I find myself looking at a list like this as a challenge. 🙂 A good third of the “overused settings and characterizations” might actually make interesting premises for stories if you were to think through both their internal contradictions and their (usually ignored) logical consequences.

    For instance, Suzette Haden Elgin made good use of “aliens whose thinking is so different from ours that no communication is possible,” in Native Tongue — though the book had other problems. Ted Chiang’s “Understand” could be taken as a very clever treatment of “all genetically superior humans have an innate drive to rule, conquer, or kill everyone else.”, except for the “genetically” part. And Vernor Vinge’s Fire Upon the Deep is, on a certain level, one big explanation for “All of the spacefaring races have roughly the same level of technology.”

    reply
  3. Jon Hansen

    Hey, I think I’ve written some of these in my, uh, early work. Yes, early work, that’s it.

    reply
  4. Doug Lain

    Somebody just banned all of my best ideas!

    Damn.

    reply

Join the Conversation

Click here to cancel reply.