Ambiguous pronouns

(Sorry if this is a repeat; I have a feeling I've talked about this before, but I can't find any reference to having done so.)

I keep seeing sentences structured something like this:

I placed the pen on the table, then stared at it.

The it is mildly ambiguous; it could refer to either pen or table. In most people's usage, though, most of the time, it would refer to pen, because using a pronoun to refer to the object of a preposition in the preceding clause is often confusing.

If the only noun in recent memory is the object of a preposition, it's sometimes not so bad:

I hovered over the table, staring at it.

But even then, if there's another noun that could reasonably be meant, I tend to resist assuming the object of the preposition is the referent for the pronoun:

I set the pen down. Then I hovered over the table, staring at it.

I'm inclined to read that it as referring to pen.

I vaguely recall that there's a great deal of argument over whether using a pronoun to refer to a preceding object-of-preposition is grammatically valid, but I don't have time to go look that up right now. For now, I'll just note that whether or not it's correct grammar, it can be confusing and awkward, and I generally recommend rephrasing to avoid it.

4 Responses to “Ambiguous pronouns”

  1. David Moles

    I think you can use a pronoun — at least the way you’re doing so here — to refer to anything, whatever the high school grammar books say; but as you point out, you may or may not be understood.

    Resolving ambiguity is hard work, and it’s work the author should take on up front.
    I’ve come to realize that one of the real keys to writing good (as opposed to just adequate) prose is not making the reader do the work.

    reply
  2. SarahP

    Hey, Jed. As you may recall from my Oregon workshop critiques, vague pronoun usage is one of my bete noirs. Sorry to pick on you, but here’s a case in point:

    “But even then, if there’s another noun that could reasonably be meant, I tend to resist assuming the object of the preposition is the referent for the pronoun:”

    In this sentence, there’s another noun that… is cluttered with unnecessary words due to the presence of the vague pronoun there, the weak verb is, and the marker word that. Stated with more perspicuity, the phrase might be rephrased as follows:

    “But even then, if another noun could reasonably be meant, I tend to resist…”

    I like what David said about the key to writing good prose. Make things easy for the reader by cleaning out the clutter, nailing down the pronouns, getting rid of the marker word “that”, and making verbs pull their weight.

    Hey, it’s perspicuity in a nutshell!

    Again, sorry for picking on that sentence, Jed! I’m just really interested in how to get language to convey information as efficiently as possible.

    reply
  3. SarahP

    Oh god, did I just edit the Jeditor?

    Ack.

    reply
  4. Jed

    While I generally strive for clarity in prose, I don’t tend to do full edits on my journal entries. So I’ll fall back on Hartman’s Law of Prescriptivist Retaliation: “Any article or statement about correct grammar, punctuation, or spelling is bound to contain at least one eror.”

    I suspect that I could’ve phrased the sentence in question more clearly by rewriting it from scratch, but so it goes.

    reply

Join the Conversation

Click here to cancel reply.