Star Wars vs. LotR vs. Matrix
A year and a half ago, I pointed to 50 Reasons Lord of the Rings "Sucks"; now I'm pleased to see that the author, Dr. Oxford, has a new essay in which he compares Lord of the Rings, The Matrix, and Star Wars and determines, with scientific objectivity, which of the three is best. He uses five main criteria: Source Material, Characters, Story Themes and Symbolism, Visual Effects, and Ghost Swordfighting Scene.
A few of my favorite bits:
George Lucas' epic is based on the Akira Kurosawa film The Seven Samurai, a 1954 Japanese masterpiece wherein a team of 19th Century Samurai free a princess by attacking a space station.
And:
In the new trilogy, Anakin Skywalker portrays a damning indictment of technology's modern dehumanization of mankind through Hayden Christensen's lifeless, almost inhuman performance. There is a river of tragedy in every robotic line he utters, a horrific monotonal indication of his cyborgal fate.
And:
A sci-fantasy epic's narrative is only as strong as its ghost/human swordfighting sequence. These, of all the scenes, require the most skillful storytelling hand lest the audience notice the sheer magnitude of the premise's ridiculousness.
Be sure to read the bibliography at the end.
Okay, now I think I can face the day.