Poly article, mono genes, libido enhancer

These items aren't really related to each other in any way, but if I were Harper's Index, I would juxtapose them to give a vaguely unsettling impression that they were.

  • Procter & Gamble is working on a testosterone patch intended to increase "women's sexual desire and performance"; they've been testing it on women "who had their ovaries removed and who suffer from Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder" (note that it's only considered a disorder "if it causes distress for the patient or problems in the patient's relationships," though it sounds like if the person's partner considers it a problem, that counts as problems in the relationship). As the Motley Fool article about the patch notes, "[T]reatment for sexual dysfunction is controversial. As P&G's own researchers acknowledge, the causes are complex, and many therapists maintain that they're largely psychological." P&G hopes to make the patch available next year. WebMD has a little more.
  • There's a gene related to vasopressin receptors. Transferring that gene from male prairie voles ("who are known to form lifelong bonds with a single mate") to male meadow voles ("who mate with multiple partners and lack vasopressin receptors") increases the meadow voles' vasopressin receptor levels, and results in the meadow voles exhibiting monogamous behavior, according to a new study published in Nature. According to the WebMD article on the study, "Researchers say previous research has shown that these vasopressin receptors may play a role in social disorders, such as autism, that make it difficult to form social bonds. . . . Studies in humans have also suggested that the same brain pathways involved in forming romantic relationships may also be involved in drug addiction. . . . 'The brain process of bonding with one's partner may be similar to becoming addicted to drugs: both activate reward circuits in the brain," says researcher Miranda Lim, a postdoctoral fellow at Emory University." Anthropologist Melvin Konner writes, in a related piece in Nature, "We are a long way from a commitment pill, but perhaps closer to a neurology of romance." I am, of course, dubious about the spectre of commitmentphobia being labeled a disease, to be treated chemically or genetically, but I'm intrigued by the story possibilities in the thought that someone who found themselves unable to stop sleeping around despite a desire to do so could take a treatment that would stop the undesired behavior.
  • "Southern Baptists called for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage." In unrelated news, the attendees of the Southern Baptist Convention "declined to vote on a resolution that called public education 'officially godless.'"
  • Naomi Darvell of Clean Sheets has an article about polyamory that quotes (with my permission) my journal entry about the Elle article about polyamory. Good article, Naomi! Unfortunately, as Naomi notes in a sidebar, Elle's editors weren't exactly enthusiastic about their article; one of them even said, ". . . I'm not advocating an open marriage movement—I think jealousy and possessiveness are actually hardwired into us for a reason, and even if they aren't, they're pretty powerful emotions to overcome."

I feel like this entry needs a reference to Brave New World somewhere, but I'm not quite sure where or how. Imagine I said something clever about it.

7 Responses to “Poly article, mono genes, libido enhancer”

  1. Sandra McDonald

    Well they might not make the Harper’s Index, but congrats on making Harpers with the list of subs you see too often! I found it while flipping pages and recognized it immediately . . .

  2. Amy

    Ack, no, not a *commitment pill*! Fidelity would be *meaningless* if you didn’t have to *suffer* for it!

    …Okay, sorry, sorry, it’s just so much fun to say. What I actually meant to say was, have you heard anything about a book called “Confessions of a Bigamist”? They were having a reading/signing in the Harvard Coop only I didn’t go because I was reading Clovermead. It appears to be a novel about a woman who meets and marries a second husband, probably more to frame a “what is her real identity” theme than to comment on non-monogamy, but I was reminded upon seeing it of your journal entry about people exploring nonmonogamy without having heard of polyamory, and then here you are referring to it, all very timely!

  3. David Moles

    I’m intrigued by the story possibilities in the thought that someone who found themselves unable to stop sleeping around despite a desire to do so could take a treatment that would stop the undesired behavior.

    I suppose, if nothing else, the availability of such a treatment would undermine the “I just couldn’t help myself, honey” excuse.

    Ack, no, not a commitment pill! Fidelity would be meaningless if you didn’t have to suffer for it!

    Oh, fine, just devalue the commitment of those of us with naturally high vasopressin receptor levels. 🙂

    Anyway, I suspect that in the long run, a “commitment pill” might lead to more suffering, although perhaps a different kind.

  4. nalo

    There was a recent Nerve article on poly, too. I found the readers’ comments just as interesting as the piece.

  5. Jed

    Sandra: Thanks! I’ve been meaning to post about that.

    Amy: Nope, don’t know anything about Confessions of a Bigamist, sorry. (And btw, in case anyone was confused, Amy was describing that book rather than Clovermead—I suspect the latter doesn’t have poly content. And I’ve been meaning to post about Clovermead, too.)

    David: Yah, I suspect a commitment pill would have unfortunate effects. But I’d love to see it included in the next nearish-future novel in which people can make drastic changes to their own personalities.

    Nalo: Nifty! (I edited your commented to put the link inline; hope that was okay.) I think that’s one of the best poly articles in a quasi-mainstream publication I’ve seen. They could’ve done a little less emphasis on “polyamory is this brand-new movement all about young people!” (a bunch of the stuff they’re talking about was old hat on alt.polyamory when I first ran into it ten years ago), and I’m not clear on why they think same-sex marriage is irrelevant to the question of poly marriage, but overall a good piece; seems to cover most of the relevant points

    …Only maybe it’s not as clear a piece as I thought, ’cause half the reader responses are from people who entirely missed various points. Sigh. The negative reader comments appear to be mostly from people who think polyamory is entirely about having lots of sex with everyone you meet—which, granted, for some people it is, but that wasn’t the focus of the article. Another case, I think, of readers seeing what they expected to see rather than what was there.

  6. Dan P

    I’m intrigued by the story possibilities in the thought that someone who found themselves unable to stop sleeping around despite a desire to do so could take a treatment that would stop the undesired behavior.

    Sounds like a situation that might arise in the world of Martha Sokup’s “In Defense of the Social Contracts” (which I believe I encountered in one of the Dozois Year’s Bests).

  7. Benjamin Rosenbaum

    I think the whole area of “which one constitutes the pathology” is a very interesting one. My dad is convinced there will someday be a chemical cure for homosexuality; if such a technology existed, I don’t see why everyone single wouldn’t use it to make themselves bisexual, to better their odds.

    Similarly here, I think the “poly-capable” pill would be just as useful as the “commitment” pill.

    Like Mr. Moles, I imagine I have naturally high vasopressin receptor levels. Even when I was in relationships that were theoretically poly (or nonexclusive, this being before the term was in wide currency), and though I liked the idea in theory, I was never really able to go through with it in practice.

    But of course, I’m kidding about the vasopressin receptor levels. There are any number of emotional components to these behaviors. Is it the “addiction to someone” effect, or the “comfort level with complex romantic interactions between multiple partners” effect, or the “nesting/safety appeal of exclusivity” effect, or the “attraction to newness vs. attraction to the deeply known” effect, or…

Comments are closed.