Items: technology and art

A few items before I go to sleep:

  • Speculative Literature Foundation announces Technology Exchange program. You can donate your spare equipment, and the Exchange will find an sf writer who needs it. The SLF is just matching up donors with recipients; it doesn't take possession of the equipment, and it doesn't supply tech support. But if you make such a donation in the US, you can write off the donation as a tax deduction. See the exchange program page for more info.
  • Zoom Quilt is an astonishing Shockwave piece that lets you do an infinite zoom-in on a particular image; it's a series of gradual transitions that reminds me somewhat of Escher's Metamorphosis, only you're moving into the image instead of across it. You could think of it as traveling around and around the inside of a torus with fantastic murals painted on the walls, I guess, but that wouldn't do justice to it. Go take a look. (Unfortunately, probably requires the Shockwave Player plug-in.)
  • Interesting web browser market share information; at that site, Internet Explorer accounts for only 73% of traffic, as opposed to the 95% that some sites are still seeing. I imagine some small part of the difference can be accounted for by the recent upsurge in popularity of Firefox as an alternative to IE. When the Firefox public preview release first went up, they had a goal of reaching a million downloads in ten days; it actually took only about five days. Now, less than a month after the preview release went up, they've had over 3.5 million downloads. See Spread Firefox for more info. Stop by, download the browser (available for Windows, Linux, and Mac), give it a try, see if you like it. And remember that the next version of IE won't be out for a long time yet. (I should note that this is still a pre-release version of Firefox; the final 1.0 release will come later this fall. But by most accounts, the preview release is quite usable in its current form.)
  • Okay, while I'm pointing to applications, a couple for OS X: Mellel, a new word processor for OS X "designed especially for scholars, creative and technical writers, and anyone seeking an agile, small-footprint yet feature-rich program," created by a small Israeli company. I haven't done much with it yet, and I have no idea whether it'll be adequate for my needs; it imports and exports Word files, but I don't know how good a job it does with them yet. It costs only $40 for a single-user license, or $60 for a five-pack for one family or site, or $30 at the educational discount rate. I've been lamenting the lack of word processors for OS X (other than MS Word), so I plan to give it a try. I also plan to give TextMate a try; it's an OS X text editor with a lot of interesting-looking features, for only $40. I'm quite satisfied with BBEdit (just upgraded to version 8.0, in fact), but I use only a fraction of BBEdit's power; seems worth looking at other options. Though BBEdit is so fast for most things that I don't have much need for a lighter-weight text editor.
  • Finally, for anyone who needs to calculate the destructive potential of a given quantity of antimatter, Edward Muller has just the thing: an antimatter calculator.

10 Responses to “Items: technology and art”

  1. metasilk

    Thanks for the market share site. I review these additional sites (roughly in order or preference):

    TheCounter.com
    Doctor HTML
    Wikipedia (and the follow-on, for October, would be: Wikipedia October stats)
    How To Create
    University of Wollongong
    W3 Schools
    Engineering WorkStations (UIUC)
    WebReference.com
    Upsdell website design

  2. Jacob

    I’m using Firefox 1.0 Preview and like it one heck of a lot. It does seem to eat a fair amount of memory (with 6 tabs open right now it’s using 75 MB of RAM) but it’s worth it just for Find As You Type if nothing else. And there are some awesome extensions, such as the Web Developer extension.

    One thing I’ve been meaning to mention, though — for some reason, since I switched to Firefox 1.0 (from 0.8) I can’t follow the comment links on your initial journal page. What’s weird is that the comment links are fine on the “view entire month” page, and they’re fine on the individual journal entries, but from the main page, when I click the comment link, I get a 404 Not Found error (or rather 404 Unfounded in your case).

    Note that this may well not be the browser itself — I’ve got several extensions added that do things like make new windows open up as new tabs instead. This may be contributing to the problem. But as I say, it works from other pages. Weird. Is the javascript different on that page? I glanced quickly at the source and didn’t see anything.

  3. Tempest

    Everyone needs to download and use Firefox right now!

    🙂

  4. Will

    As another data point for Jacob’s observations about the comments links in Firefox, they worked fine for me using the plain Firefox (with no added extensions, etc) on OS 10.3.5.

  5. Jacob

    Never mind.

    I uninstalled the Single Window extension that makes new windows open as new tabs instead. Now the comment links work fine. What’s annoying is that I had tried it after clicking to turn off the Single Window functionality, but it didn’t help. I had to uninstall it altogether.

    So now I’ve got a dilemma — I prefer having new “windows” always open as tabs, but I read this journal frequently. Which is more of a pain? Maybe I’ll try it this way for a while and see.

    Sure is weird, though, that the problem occurred on the main page but not the other pages….

  6. Jed

    Thanks for the URLs, Metasilk! I converted them to links for better display in the narrow pop-up comments window.

    One thing that the Safalra site I linked to mentions that most other sites don’t talk about is web crawlers/spiders/bots, which I gather tend to account for about 10% of traffic to a given site; bots often reports their user agent as being IE. Also, various browsers can be set to tell websites that they’re a different browser, usually to get around annoying code that prevents you from viewing a site if you aren’t using the “right” browser (even though it works fine in other browsers). So IE is almost certainly overcounted in a lot of sites.

    Most sites that talk about browser share also seem to ignore the fact that different audiences use different browsers. For example, sites aimed at web developers are likely to see a somewhat different different mix of browsers than sites aimed at the general public. The NedStat stats page for SH varies a lot over time (I’m not clear on how big a sample it uses), but at the moment it’s showing nearly 8% Safari and over 12% Firefox, with only about 66% IE; that’s pretty much unheard-of on the really big sites.

    Jacob: Interesting. I’ve now changed the code so that the comments links on the front page are the same as the ones on other pages; give it a try and let me know if it works. If it does, then the problem is that I was using an unencoded ampersand in the links on the main page; on the one hand, unencoded ampersands in URLs are technically not valid XHTML, but on the other hand, they’re extremely widely used. So I would say that the Single Window extension is probably not quite as flexible as it ought to be in that regard. Unless I’m wrong and my change has no effect on this problem. Let me know either way.

  7. Jacob

    Sorry, that didn’t do it. I reinstalled the Single Window extension and it’s back to not working on the main page but working on the individual entries and the monthly pages. It looks as though the monthly pages are using unencoded ampersands while the individual entries are using encoded ones, so since both work for me I guess that’s not it.

    Further note: the comment links on the main page do work for me as links (if, for example, I right click and select “Open Link in New Tab”); they are only a problem when the OnClick event tries to use JavaScript to open a new window. This is very odd, as the URL’s you give as the href and as the parameters for the JavaScript appear to be identical.

    Do you have access to your web server error logs? Since I’m getting a 404 Not Found error, your error logs should be able to show what page my browser was attempting to open, which might be a clue to the problem. My IP address should show up as 160.79.xx.xx, with many entries today.

  8. Jacob

    Aha! I installed the Live Headers extension so that I could see what page I was trying to get. It appears that, from the main page only, when I use javascript, it’s trying to open “http://www.kith.org/logos/show-comments.php?Entry_ID=2330&Comments=7”
    instead of
    “http://www.kith.org/logos/journal/show-comments.php?Entry_ID=2330&Comments=7”

    That is to say, it’s dropping the “journal” directory from the path.

    Oho! I have also now discovered that if I start at “http://www.kith.org/logos/journal/index.php” instead of starting at “http://www.kith.org/logos/journal/” (which is what I had bookmarked) the problem does not occur. Clearly the javascript runtime, when trying to resolve a relative URL, is a bit messed up here.

    I shall change my bookmark for your journal, and my problem will be solved. You probably shouldn’t do anything at all. I will drop a line to the Single Window extension developers, as that seems to be where the problem is occurring.

    Aren’t computers fun?

  9. Ted

    Regarding the antimatter calculator: I think the calculator is doing a straight matter-to-energy conversion. However, in an actual matter/antimatter explosion, about a third of the energy is released in the form of neutrinos, and can probably be assumed to be harmless.

  10. David D. Levine

    Re “I’ve been lamenting the lack of word processors for OS X”, have you looked into ThinkFree Office (http://www.thinkfree.com/)?

Comments are closed.